Court Cases & Orders

Ontario Court Confirms Vocational Assessments as Expert Evidence in Family Law Cases

Written by Russell Alexander ria@russellalexander.com / (905) 655-6335

A recent decision by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has confirmed that vocational assessments are admissible as expert evidence in family law cases, reinforcing their role in determining a party’s employability for support purposes. The ruling aligns with established legal principles and recognizes that vocational assessments, which have long been used in personal injury litigation, are equally relevant in family law disputes where income imputation is at issue.

What is a Vocational Assessment?

A vocational assessment is an expert evaluation that determines an individual’s employability, earning capacity, and job prospects based on their skills, education, work history, and medical or personal limitations. In family law cases, these assessments are particularly useful when one party is unemployed or underemployed, and the court must decide whether to impute income—assigning a specific income level for spousal or child support calculations.

The Court’s Analysis: Why Vocational Assessments Are Admissible

The Ontario Superior Court applied the legal test from White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co. and R. v. Mohan, which establish the four-part threshold for admitting expert evidence:

  1. Relevance – The expert opinion must assist the court in resolving a key issue in the case.
  2. Necessity – The evidence must provide insight beyond common knowledge or what the court can determine on its own.
  3. Absence of an Exclusionary Rule – The evidence must not be barred by any legal rule.
  4. Proper Qualification of the Expert – The expert must have recognized credentials and experience in the relevant field.

The court affirmed that vocational assessments meet all four criteria, making them admissible expert evidence in family law cases where a party’s employment capacity and earning potential are disputed.

Key Findings of the Decision

Vocational Assessments Are Directly Relevant to Income Imputation

The court ruled that vocational assessments are critical in support disputes where one party claims they are unable to work or earn a certain income. By evaluating a person’s skills, qualifications, and job market opportunities, vocational experts provide objective insights that courts can use to impute income fairly.

Vocational Expertise Goes Beyond General Knowledge

Judges do not have the specialized knowledge required to assess labour market trends, occupational demands, or rehabilitation needs. The court found that vocational assessments go beyond common understanding, making them necessary in cases involving income disputes.

Hearsay Concerns Do Not Make the Evidence Inadmissible

Expert evidence is a form of hearsay, as it is based on reports and third-party information rather than firsthand observation. However, the court confirmed that vocational assessments fall within the legal exceptions to hearsay rules, as their methodology and conclusions can be tested through cross-examination.

Expert Qualifications Are Essential, But Prior Court Testimony Is Not Required

The court considered the expert’s credentials, experience, and impartiality in determining their qualifications. While this was the expert’s first time testifying in court, the judge clarified that a lack of prior testimony does not disqualify an expert, as long as their professional background supports their expertise.

Why This Decision Matters for Family Law Cases

The admission of vocational assessments as expert evidence strengthens the tools available to courts in spousal and child support disputes. This ruling confirms that:

  • Courts can rely on expert vocational assessments to determine whether a party is capable of working and at what income level.
  • Income can be fairly imputed when a spouse is voluntarily underemployed or unemployed.
  • Expert testimony on employability is just as relevant in family law as it is in personal injury cases, where similar assessments are already widely accepted.

Final Thoughts

This decision is a significant win for fairness and clarity in family law proceedings. It ensures that courts have objective, expert-backed assessments when determining a party’s ability to work and earn an income. For anyone navigating a divorce or support dispute where employment capacity is in question, vocational assessments may now play a pivotal role in determining financial obligations.

Stay in Touch

Keep learning about the latest issues in Ontario family law! Subscribe to our newsletter, have our latest articles delivered to your inbox, or listen to our Podcast Family Law Now.

Be sure to find out more about the "new normal", by visiting our Covid-19 and Divorce Information Centre.

About the author

Russell Alexander

Russell Alexander is the Founder & Senior Partner of Russell Alexander Collaborative Family Lawyers.