Parenting Time & Decision Making

When A Child Refuses Time With A Parent: What Ontario Parents Need to Know and What Courts Actually Do – Part 1

Written by Russell Alexander ria@russellalexander.com / (905) 655-6335

It is one of the most difficult moments in family law. A child says no. They do not want to see one parent. They resist transitions. They refuse to get in the car. They shut down, or they lash out.

Parents often arrive asking the same question. If my child does not want to go, do I still have to make them?

The answer in Ontario is not as simple as many expect. A child’s wishes matter. They are not the only factor. And how a parent responds in these moments can have long term legal and emotional consequences.

This article sets the foundation. What the law says. What courts look for. And what parents should and should not do when a child refuses time.

Why this issue is so common

Refusal is not rare. It shows up at all ages, for different reasons, and often in waves.

Common drivers include:

  • Loyalty conflicts where the child feels pressure to take sides
  • Anxiety around transitions between homes
  • Different parenting styles or household rules
  • A breakdown in trust following conflict or litigation
  • Developmental stages where independence increases
  • In some cases, genuine concerns about safety or well being

The mistake is treating every refusal the same. Courts do not. They look closely at context.

What the law in Ontario actually says

Under the Divorce Act and Ontario’s Children’s Law Reform Act, the governing principle is the best interests of the child.

A child’s views and preferences are one factor among many. The weight given depends on age, maturity, and consistency.

Courts will consider:

  • How strongly the child is expressing their preference
  • Whether the preference is independent or influenced
  • The history of the relationship with each parent
  • Each parent’s ability to support the child’s relationship with the other
  • Any evidence of risk or harm

There is no age where a child gets to decide. A fourteen year old is not the same as a seven year old, but neither has a veto.

The key point is this. Courts expect parents to parent. Not to delegate decisions about contact to the child.

What judges look for when a child refuses

Judges are less interested in the refusal itself and more interested in how the parents respond.

They are looking for patterns.

  • Does one parent encourage or tolerate the refusal
  • Does the other parent escalate conflict or react emotionally
  • Is anyone taking steps to understand the root cause
  • Is the child being supported or being put in the middle

A parent who says, the child does not want to go so I did not make them, is taking a legal risk. Courts often interpret that as a failure to support the child’s relationship with the other parent.

On the other hand, forcing a child physically or emotionally without addressing the underlying issue can also backfire.

The court expects balance. Structure with sensitivity.

What you should do in the moment

When refusal happens, your response matters more than the refusal itself.

Focus on these principles:

  • Stay calm and consistent. Do not match the child’s emotional intensity
  • Communicate expectations clearly. Time with the other parent is not optional
  • Avoid negative commentary about the other parent. Even subtle comments matter
  • Document what is happening without turning it into a running conflict
  • Look for patterns. Is this tied to transitions, school stress, or specific events

Most importantly, do not turn the child into the decision maker.

What you should not do

There are predictable mistakes that make these cases worse:

  • Letting the child opt out repeatedly
  • Rewarding refusal by allowing preferred activities instead
  • Sharing adult legal or financial conflict with the child
  • Using the refusal as leverage in negotiations
  • Cutting off communication with the other parent

These actions can quickly shift a case from manageable to high conflict.

How parenting plans can prevent this

Many of these situations are avoidable with better structure on the front end.

If you have not already, review your approach to parenting planning. A strong plan anticipates transitions, communication, and dispute resolution.

For a practical framework, see my earlier article on Divorcing in Ontario? These 4 Parenting Strategies Can Boost Your Child’s Success

And for a deeper dive into building durable arrangements, see A Comprehensive Guide to Creating Effective Parenting Plans

These are not theoretical. They are the difference between a plan that works on paper and one that holds under stress.

Where this goes next

In Part 2, we will deal with the harder question. What if the refusal continues.

We will cover:

  • When to involve a parenting coordinator or therapist
  • How views of the child reports and assessments are used in Ontario
  • What to do if you believe the refusal is being influenced
  • When court intervention becomes necessary and what that actually looks like

If you are dealing with this issue now, the instinct is to react. The better move is to step back and handle it in a way that protects both your child and your position.

Because once refusal becomes entrenched, it is much harder to unwind.

Stay in Touch

Keep learning about the latest issues in Ontario family law! Subscribe to our newsletter, have our latest articles delivered to your inbox, or listen to our Podcast Family Law Now.

Be sure to find out more about the "new normal", by visiting our Covid-19 and Divorce Information Centre.

About the author

Russell Alexander

Russell Alexander is the Founder & Senior Partner of Russell Alexander Collaborative Family Lawyers.